I start with whatever is costing you the most time. The fix gets built in the tools you already own, and you keep it.
Work piles up at the same desks every week. Handoffs get dropped. 3 people keep 3 versions of the same tracker, and nobody trusts any of them.
I map how work actually moves through your office, which is rarely what the org chart says. Then I cut the double entry and close the gaps where things fall through.
A process your team follows because it is easier than the old way.
Every project reinvents its folder structure. Last month’s RFI response takes twenty minutes to find. The good template lives on one estimator’s hard drive.
I set up one folder structure every project starts from, with names that make sense and templates for the documents you send every week.
A new project is set up in minutes, and anyone can find anything.
Dailies, weeklies, progress claims, owner updates. Half of every report is re-typing things someone already wrote down somewhere else.
Reports get drafted from what your team already captures during the week. You review them and send.
Your Friday afternoon back, and reports that go out on time.
You've heard the pitch at every conference. Most of it is noise.
Most of what gets sold as an AI problem is really a process problem. I'll tell you which one you have before you spend anything, and when AI is the right tool, I build it on your own project data.
What AI is actually good for →Step 1
Coffee or a video call. Tell me where the work gets stuck, and I'll tell you what's fixable and whether I'm the right fit. It's free.
Step 2
I spend time with your team and watch how the work actually moves. The real problem is rarely the one on the whiteboard. You see what I found before anything gets built.
Step 3
I build it in your tools and test it on a live project before I hand it over. Your team owns it, with no subscription to me.
Not sure which of these is your problem? That's normal. It's usually 2 of them tangled together.
Talk to Jared